The structure of
the U.S. military is rapidly changing as a result of the use of unmanned
robotic technologies in warfare. These
changes will establish new perspectives on the role of gender in the military
and affect the drone operator fighting from afar differently from an individual
serving in combat. According to the articles by NPR and Frontline, the change
in atmosphere of war is causing some drone operators to experience post-traumatic
stress disorder. Of the Air Force pilots interviewed for this survey, 29
percent claimed that they were suffering from high levels of fatigue and
stress. It seems obvious to me that drone pilots would experience such high
levels of stress. I cannot imagine spending 12 hours a day, 7 days a week
watching a group of civilians who I may accidentally kill from later launching
a drone strike to attack a terrorist in that area. The Frontline article argues
that only 4 percent of drone operators experience PTSD, in comparison to 12-14
percent of troops on the ground in Iraq. There
needs to be a way to separate the individuals who set off the drone strike from
the individual who watches over the area for the days before the attack. Separation of the surveillance team from the drone strike team could be beneficial to the drone operators. Another method of reform could be improving the accuracy of the drones so they are less likely to kill noncombatants. If more innocent lives were saved, drone operators would experience lower levels of stress. Reform
must be put in place to lower these high levels of stress, even if the level of
post-traumatic stress disorder is lower for drone operators in comparison to
troops serving in combat.
In addition to
high stress levels, the use of drones has affected the role of gender in the
military. In the past, women were barred from performing in combat. Blanchard’s
article discusses that with drone warfare there is no longer a physical
restriction to lessen the likelihood that women will serve in the military. As
a result, women may be able to work more as drone operators in the military. However,
I do not think drones will have a large effect with altering the number of
women participants serving in the military. In today’s present society, women
are supposed to be treated equally to men in the military. There has been a
rise of women in the Army and Air Force in recent years as a result of the
equal right to serve the United States. As the idea of drone warfare continues
to grow more respectable in the military, both men and women will become
attracted to the drone operator position. However, the high levels of stress may lead to people avoiding this position no matter if they are a woman or a man. Reform is essential to successfully
implement the changes to the military and negative impact to soldiers that may result from drone warfare.
Of course sch a separation would include a group of drone operators who are basically 'assassins'.
ReplyDeleteThis is true. I wonder what the impact of this would be on the individual.
ReplyDeleteI agree that something should be done about the drone missiles. Either making the drones more accurate, or decreasing the kill radius of the missiles could save noncombatants lives. If the government could do that I think fewer drone operators would experience PTSD. I don't think drone operators would be a popular job among women if they had the chance to do it. If men and women lose interest in the job that could push towards drones being non-human supervised and lead to drones making decisions on their own.
ReplyDeleteI think the main problem that you touched on was the hours spent controlling these drones. In order to reduce stress levels, their needs to be an increase in UAV pilots.
ReplyDeleteI think it will be interesting to see the gender debate in drones as we progress. Would delegating women to the task be considered sexist?
ReplyDelete